Searches titles, abstracts and body text. Two characters minimum.

Research Note · Faculty Development

Faculty Development and HRD Theory

Series
Faculty Development in Medical Education · Part 4
Tags
faculty development · workplace learning · career development · organization development
Date
Posted · Updated 2026.09.26
Abstract

This article surveys the HRD theory groups connected to faculty development in medical education at the individual, relational, organizational, and institutional levels. Drawing on the medical faculty development literature, it sets out the core concepts and documented uses of adult learning, expertise development, workplace learning, careers and identity, organizational learning, and critical HRD. For each concept it states what the concept explains and the conditions under which it holds when faculty learning and development are described within the curriculum and assessment systems of medical education.

Literature on faculty development in medical education

In Steinert et al. (2006) and the follow-up review Steinert et al. (2016), the authors systematically reviewed programs designed to improve teaching effectiveness. They identified experiential learning, feedback and reflection, collegial relationships, and sustained programs as conditions that support improvements in teaching. In a study of the Korean context, the research team reported that medical school faculty members’ development needs span student education, research, leadership, and self-development (Im et al. (2024)).

The work of O’Sullivan and Irby (2011) and Steinert (2010) describes how communities help participants apply what they learn in a program to the workplace. The review by McLean et al. (2008) examined the history and scope of faculty development across diverse faculty roles and organizational needs. The account by Steinert (2020) identifies organizational development and change as directions for faculty development.

Medical education has established frameworks for curricula and faculty development, including CBME, EPA, the Kern model, AMEE·BEME guides, and accreditation standards. It has developed a culture of measurement and assessment. HRD theories provide a basis for explaining faculty learning, careers, relationships, and organizational support within this established foundation.

Individual learning and expertise development

The framework proposed by McLagan (1989) outlined the scope of HRD by linking training and development, career development, and organizational development. The account by Swanson and Holton (2001) emphasizes expertise development and performance improvement, drawing on psychology, economics, and systems theory. The review by Watkins (1991) discusses the disciplinary pluralism of HRD. The analysis by Kuchinke (1998) examines the relationship between learning and performance. The review by Lee (2001) examined definitions of HRD, variation in practice across contexts, and its moral dimensions.

Andragogy, as described by Knowles (1973), incorporates learners’ experience, self-direction, readiness, and orientation toward problems into education. The model developed by Kolb (1984) describes how experience is transformed. The work of Schön (1983) addresses reflection-in-action and reflection-on-action in uncertain practice situations. The account by Mezirow (1991) examines transformative learning, in which learners critically review existing meaning perspectives. The work of Brookfield (1986) discusses relationships that prompt learners to examine their assumptions critically. The synthesis by Merriam and Baumgartner (2020) brings together theories of adult learning and their sociocultural contexts.

In medical education, the review by Norman (1999) examined the empirical evidence for approaches that assume learning principles unique to adults. The synthesis by Taylor and Hamdy (2013) integrated several approaches to adult learning, taking educational contexts and learning processes into account. In faculty development, relevant considerations include the distinction between clinical and pedagogical experience, readiness for the learning task, and the time available for reflection.

The work of Ericsson et al. (1993) addressed tasks designed to improve specific aspects of performance and the process of feedback and revision in deliberate practice. The accounts by Benner (1984) and Dreyfus (2004) presented a model in which novices who rely on rules accumulate experience and develop into experts who grasp situations as a whole. Adaptive expertise, proposed by Hatano and Inagaki (1986), encompasses performing familiar tasks efficiently, understanding principles, and adjusting performance to new conditions. The concept of masterity in Chang (2015) describes a life that combines continuous learning with creative practice.

In medical education, the work of Ericsson (2004) explained how medical performance develops through deliberate practice. The account by Steinert et al. (2021) presents adaptive expertise as a perspective on faculty development. Applying concepts of expertise to faculty development involves distinguishing the tasks, experience, and feedback conditions of clinical care from those of teaching.

Workplace learning, careers, and identity

The account by Lave and Wenger (1991) conceptualized how people learn to engage in a community’s activities through legitimate peripheral participation. The work of Wenger (1998) brought learning, meaning, and identity into a single framework of communities of practice. The accounts by Marsick and Watkins (2001) and Eraut (2004) discuss informal and incidental learning in the workplace and levels of intentionality and awareness in learning. The framework developed by Billett (2001) describes the interplay between the opportunities a workplace affords and an individual’s willingness to engage. The analysis by Fuller and Unwin (2003) placed learning environments along an expansive–restrictive continuum according to work arrangements and conditions for participation.

The study by Cantillon et al. (2016) analyzed how clinicians become teachers by participating in clinical communities of practice. Medical school faculty members learn in several contexts: the university, the clinical department, the ward, and relationships with colleagues.

The framework developed by Super (1980) encompassed the multiple roles people hold throughout life. The account by Savickas (2005) focused on how people give meaning and direction to occupational experience. The work of Hall (2004) addressed personal values and self-direction in the protean career. The book edited by Arthur and Rousseau (1996) addressed boundaries and mobility across organizations in the boundaryless career. Provisional selves, as described by Ibarra (1999), involve testing new professional roles through observation, experimentation, and feedback. The framework proposed by Higgins and Kram (2001) describes developmental networks composed of multiple relationships.

The work of Steinert et al. (2019) and Cantillon et al. (2019) situates teacher identity within social contexts and institutional recognition. In medical schools, clinical department affiliation, promotion regulations, and the recognition of teaching roles influence individual choices and role formation.

Learning transfer and organizational support

Learning transfer is the process of generalizing knowledge and skills acquired in training to the job and maintaining them over time. The framework developed by Baldwin and Ford (1988) brought together learner characteristics, training design, and the work environment as the three dimensions of transfer. The work of Rouiller and Goldstein (1993) and Holton et al. (2000) addressed environmental conditions for transfer, including supervisor and peer support and organizational expectations. The literature review by Burke and Hutchins (2007) and the meta-analysis by Blume et al. (2010) summarize factors associated with learning transfer and the relationships among them.

The article by Yelon et al. (2014) applied transfer research to faculty development programs. The study by Yelon et al. (2013) traced how physicians who had participated in faculty development adapted teaching ideas to their own settings and used them years later. Learning transfer explains how faculty members apply and adapt what they learn in faculty development to their teaching work, along with the conditions that shape this process. In medical schools, those conditions include clinical schedules, the time allocated to teaching, opportunities to use new teaching methods, and collegial support.

Self-determination theory, as presented by Ryan and Deci (2000), explains how motivation relates to the satisfaction of needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness. The study by O’Sullivan and Irby (2015) used this theory to explore workshop leaders’ intrinsic motivation. The job demands-resources (JD-R) model developed by Demerouti et al. (2001) distinguished job demands and resources as two pathways to burnout. The concept of job crafting, introduced by Wrzesniewski and Dutton (2001), describes how organizational members reshape their tasks, relationships, and understanding of what their work means.

Perceived organizational support (POS), as described by Eisenberger et al. (1986), is members’ perception that the organization values their contributions and cares about their well-being. Psychological safety, as described by Edmondson (1999), is a shared belief that a team is safe for interpersonal risk-taking. Autonomous motivation operates at the individual level.

Organizational learning and knowledge creation

The concept of double-loop learning, proposed by Argyris and Schön (1978), involves reexamining the assumptions behind action. The 4I framework developed by Crossan et al. (1999) linked learning at the individual, group, and organizational levels through intuiting, interpreting, integrating, and institutionalizing. The work of Nonaka (1994) addressed how interactions between tacit and explicit knowledge generate new knowledge. The account by Weick (1995) examined how organizational members construct meaning through action and interpretation in ambiguous situations. The work of Senge (1990) and Marsick and Watkins (2003) discusses organizational structures and cultures that support learning.

The study by Plack et al. (2015) describes how medical education fellowship graduates share the knowledge and teaching experience they acquire with colleagues, interpret it collectively, and change their work practices. In medical schools, applying organizational learning concepts involves considering opportunities to discuss teaching experience and procedures for incorporating that experience into curriculum implementation and work rules.

Performance engineering and organizational development

The behavior engineering model proposed by Gilbert (1978) includes information, tools, resources, reward systems, and individual competence. The framework developed by Rummler and Brache (1995) addressed how work connects departments and how the organization, processes, and jobs align. The account by Swanson (1995) treated performance improvement as a central task of HRD. Applying these concepts to curriculum implementation in medical education involves examining faculty knowledge and skills alongside the authority and resources allocated to teaching and workflows across departments.

The account by Lewin (1947) explained group equilibrium and change in terms of interacting forces. The work of Schein (2010) described organizational culture as the basic assumptions people form as they learn together. The model developed by Burke and Litwin (1992) set out relationships among factors involved in organizational performance and change. The framework proposed by Kotter (1996) outlined procedures for driving change. The synthesis by Cummings and Worley (2015) brings together approaches to organizational diagnosis and interventions for change.

The account by White et al. (2013) used the Kotter model to explain curriculum reform undertaken in response to accreditation. In Korea, the study by An (2018) used Lewin’s force field analysis to examine curriculum reform at one medical school over time.

Critical HRD and diversity

The work of Fenwick (2004) discusses power, exclusion, and emancipation in the theory and practice of critical HRD. The study by Bierema and Cseh (2003) examined HRD research through a feminist research framework. The analysis by Sambrook (2009) explored the concept of critical HRD. Critical HRD examines the purposes of learning and development, how opportunities to participate are distributed, and who has a voice in decision-making.

In medical education, the work of Kumagai and Lypson (2009) discussed social justice and critical consciousness. In medical schools, this involves examining institutional conditions associated with rank, gender, specialty, and employment type, along with people’s experiences of participation.

Summary of theory groups

The classifications of use are based solely on the literature included in the table.

Theory groupLevel of analysisRepresentative conceptsRepresentative literatureUse in faculty development literature
HRD definitions and academic foundationsIndividual, organizational, institutionalTraining and development, career development, organizational development, learning–performance debateMcLagan (1989), Watkins (1991), Lee (2001)Limited
Adult learningIndividual, relationalAndragogy, experiential learning, reflection, transformative learningKnowles (1973), Kolb (1984), Mezirow (1991)Extensive
Workplace and informal learningIndividual, relational, organizationalParticipation opportunities, expansive–restrictive environments, communities of practiceLave & Wenger (1991), Billett (2001), Fuller & Unwin (2003)Extensive
Expertise developmentIndividual, relationalDeliberate practice, stages of skill acquisition, adaptive expertise, masterityEricsson et al. (1993), Dreyfus (2004), Chang (2015)Some
Careers and identityIndividual, relational, organizational, institutionalProtean and boundaryless careers, provisional selves, developmental networksSuper (1980), Ibarra (1999), Hall (2004)Some
Learning transferIndividual, relational, organizationalGeneralization and maintenance, transfer climate, opportunities for useBaldwin & Ford (1988), Holton et al. (2000), Blume et al. (2010)Some
Motivation, jobs, and supportIndividual, relational, organizationalAutonomous motivation, job demands and resources, job crafting, POS, psychological safetyEdmondson (1999), Ryan & Deci (2000), Demerouti et al. (2001)Some
Organizational learning and knowledge creationIndividual, relational, organizationalDouble-loop learning, 4I, tacit and explicit knowledge, sensemakingArgyris & Schön (1978), Nonaka (1994), Crossan et al. (1999)Some
Performance engineering and systemsIndividual, organizationalBehavior engineering model, organization–process–job alignmentGilbert (1978), Rummler & Brache (1995), Swanson (1995)Limited
Organizational development and changeRelational, organizational, institutionalGroup dynamics, organizational culture, leading changeLewin (1947), Burke & Litwin (1992), Kotter (1996)Some
Critical HRD and diversityIndividual, relational, organizational, institutionalPower, voice, distribution of development opportunitiesBierema & Cseh (2003), Fenwick (2004), Sambrook (2009)Limited

Scope of this article

The literature on faculty development in medical education provides examples of how the core concepts of 11 major groups of HRD theories apply to medical education. These concepts address individual, relational, organizational, and institutional levels, and their application depends on conditions in medical schools, where clinical care, research, and teaching coexist.

References

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Addison-Wesley.
  • Arthur, M. B., & Rousseau, D. M. (Eds.). (1996). The boundaryless career: A new employment principle for a new organizational era. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195100143.001.0001
  • Baldwin, T. T., & Ford, J. K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41(1), 63–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00632.x
  • Benner, P. (1984). From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Addison-Wesley.
  • Bierema, L. L., & Cseh, M. (2003). Evaluating AHRD research using a feminist research framework. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 14(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1047
  • Billett, S. (2001). Learning through work: Workplace affordances and individual engagement. Journal of Workplace Learning, 13(5), 209–214. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005548
  • Blume, B. D., Ford, J. K., Baldwin, T. T., & Huang, J. L. (2010). Transfer of training: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management, 36(4), 1065–1105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309352880
  • Brookfield, S. D. (1986). Understanding and facilitating adult learning: A comprehensive analysis of principles and effective practices. Jossey-Bass.
  • Burke, L. A., & Hutchins, H. M. (2007). Training transfer: An integrative literature review. Human Resource Development Review, 6(3), 263–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484307303035
  • Burke, W. W., & Litwin, G. H. (1992). A causal model of organizational performance and change. Journal of Management, 18(3), 523–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639201800306
  • Cantillon, P., D’Eath, M., De Grave, W., & Dornan, T. (2016). How do clinicians become teachers? A communities of practice perspective. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 21(5), 991–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-016-9674-9
  • Cantillon, P., Dornan, T., & De Grave, W. (2019). Becoming a clinical teacher: Identity formation in context. Academic Medicine, 94(10), 1610–1618. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002403
  • Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522–537. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2202135
  • Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2015). Organization development and change (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499
  • Dreyfus, S. E. (2004). The five-stage model of adult skill acquisition. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 24(3), 177–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467604264992
  • Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
  • Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500–507. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500
  • Eraut, M. (2004). Informal learning in the workplace. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(2), 247–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/158037042000225245
  • Ericsson, K. A. (2004). Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Academic Medicine, 79(10 Suppl.), S70–S81. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200410001-00022
  • Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363
  • Fenwick, T. J. (2004). Toward a critical HRD in theory and practice. Adult Education Quarterly, 54(3), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713604263051
  • Fuller, A., & Unwin, L. (2003). Learning as apprentices in the contemporary UK workplace: Creating and managing expansive and restrictive participation. Journal of Education and Work, 16(4), 407–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/1363908032000093012
  • Gilbert, T. F. (1978). Human competence: Engineering worthy performance. McGraw-Hill.
  • Hall, D. T. (2004). The protean career: A quarter-century journey. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2003.10.006
  • Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1986). Two courses of expertise. In H. W. Stevenson, H. Azuma, & K. Hakuta (Eds.), Child development and education in Japan (pp. 262–272). W. H. Freeman.
  • Higgins, M. C., & Kram, K. E. (2001). Reconceptualizing mentoring at work: A developmental network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 264–288. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378023
  • Holton, E. F., III, Bates, R. A., & Ruona, W. E. A. (2000). Development of a generalized learning transfer system inventory. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 11(4), 333–360. https://doi.org/10.1002/1532-1096%28200024%2911%3A4%3C333%3A%3AAID-HRDQ2%3E3.0.CO%3B2-P
  • Ibarra, H. (1999). Provisional selves: Experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 764–791. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667055
  • Im, J. H., Kang, W. S., Lee, S. H., Jeong, D. C., Kim, D. H., Lim, M.-S., Kim, M., Seo, J.-H., & Lee, D. H. (2024). Needs and gaps of faculty development for medical schools. Korean Journal of Medical Education, 36(2), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2024.295
  • Knowles, M. S. (1973). The adult learner: A neglected species. Gulf Publishing Company.
  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.
  • Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Harvard Business School Press.
  • Kuchinke, K. P. (1998). Moving beyond the dualism of performance versus learning: A response to Barrie and Pace. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 9(4), 377–384. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.3920090408
  • Kumagai, A. K., & Lypson, M. L. (2009). Beyond cultural competence: Critical consciousness, social justice, and multicultural education. Academic Medicine, 84(6), 782–787. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181a42398
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
  • Lee, M. (2001). A refusal to define HRD. Human Resource Development International, 4(3), 327–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678860110059348
  • Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science; social equilibria and social change. Human Relations, 1(1), 5–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674700100103
  • Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. E. (2001). Informal and incidental learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2001(89), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.5
  • Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. E. (2003). Demonstrating the value of an organization’s learning culture: The dimensions of the learning organization questionnaire. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5(2), 132–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422303005002002
  • McLagan, P. A. (1989). Models for HRD practice. Training & Development Journal, 43(9), 49–59.
  • McLean, M., Cilliers, F., & van Wyk, J. M. (2008). Faculty development: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Medical Teacher, 30(6), 555–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590802109834
  • Merriam, S. B., & Baumgartner, L. M. (2020). Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
  • Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass.
  • Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
  • Norman, G. R. (1999). The adult learner: A mythical species. Academic Medicine, 74(8), 886–889. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199908000-00011
  • O’Sullivan, P. S., & Irby, D. M. (2011). Reframing research on faculty development. Academic Medicine, 86(4), 421–428. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31820dc058
  • O’Sullivan, P. S., & Irby, D. M. (2015). What motivates occasional faculty developers to lead faculty development workshops? A qualitative study. Academic Medicine, 90(11), 1536–1540. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000767
  • Plack, M. M., Goldman, E. F., Wesner, M., Manikoth, N., & Haywood, Y. (2015). How learning transfers: A study of how graduates of a faculty education fellowship influenced the behaviors and practices of their peers and organizations. Academic Medicine, 90(3), 372–378. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000440
  • Rouiller, J. Z., & Goldstein, I. L. (1993). The relationship between organizational transfer climate and positive transfer of training. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 4(4), 377–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.3920040408
  • Rummler, G. A., & Brache, A. P. (1995). Improving performance: How to manage the white space on the organization chart (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  • Sambrook, S. (2009). Critical HRD: A concept analysis. Personnel Review, 38(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480910920714
  • Savickas, M. L. (2005). The theory and practice of career construction. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work (pp. 42–70). John Wiley & Sons.
  • Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
  • Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday/Currency.
  • Steinert, Y. (2010). Faculty development: From workshops to communities of practice. Medical Teacher, 32(5), 425–428. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421591003677897
  • Steinert, Y. (2020). Faculty development: From rubies to oak. Medical Teacher, 42(4), 429–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2019.1688769
  • Steinert, Y., Irby, D. M., & Dolmans, D. (2021). Reframing faculty development practice and research through the lens of adaptive expertise. Medical Teacher, 43(8), 865–867. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2021.1931081
  • Steinert, Y., Mann, K., Anderson, B., Barnett, B. M., Centeno, A., Naismith, L., Prideaux, D., Spencer, J., Tullo, E., Viggiano, T., Ward, H., & Dolmans, D. (2016). A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to enhance teaching effectiveness: A 10-year update: BEME Guide No. 40. Medical Teacher, 38(8), 769–786. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2016.1181851
  • Steinert, Y., Mann, K., Centeno, A., Dolmans, D., Spencer, J., Gelula, M., & Prideaux, D. (2006). A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME Guide No. 8. Medical Teacher, 28(6), 497–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590600902976
  • Steinert, Y., O’Sullivan, P. S., & Irby, D. M. (2019). Strengthening teachers’ professional identities through faculty development. Academic Medicine, 94(7), 963–968. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002695
  • Super, D. E. (1980). A life-span, life-space approach to career development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 16(3), 282–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791%2880%2990056-1
  • Swanson, R. A. (1995). Human resource development: Performance is the key. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 6(2), 207–213. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.3920060208
  • Swanson, R. A., & Holton, E. F., III. (2001). Foundations of human resource development. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  • Taylor, D. C. M., & Hamdy, H. (2013). Adult learning theories: Implications for learning and teaching in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 83. Medical Teacher, 35(11), e1561–e1572. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.828153
  • Watkins, K. E. (1991). Essay review: Many voices: Defining human resource development from different disciplines. Adult Education Quarterly, 41(4), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001848191041004004
  • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Sage.
  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932
  • White, J., Paslawski, T., & Kearney, R. (2013). ‘Discovery learning’: An account of rapid curriculum change in response to accreditation. Medical Teacher, 35(7), e1319–e1326. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.770133
  • Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179–201. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378011
  • Yelon, S. L., Ford, J. K., & Anderson, W. A. (2014). Twelve tips for increasing transfer of training from faculty development programs. Medical Teacher, 36(11), 945–950. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.929098
  • Yelon, S. L., Ford, J. K., & Golden, S. (2013). Transfer over time: Stories about transfer years after training. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 25(4), 43–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21131
  • 장원섭. (2015). 장인의 탄생: 교육학자 장원섭 교수가 찾아낸 20인의 장인과 그들의 이야기. 학지사.
  • Chang, W. (2015). The making of a master: 20 masters and their stories discovered by education scholar Professor 장원섭. Hakjisa.